Food Stamp Use in Kansas City

Statistics on food stamp recipients in Kansas City are not easy to come by, as most data sets focus on a broader scope, for instance looking at all of Missouri or Kansas.

However, it is known that in 2009, 21% of Jackson County residents were on food stamps. Jackson County had a population of about 705,700 in 2009, meaning about 148,200 Kansas Citians used them that year. This included 40% of Jackson County children, 11% of white residents, and 48% of black residents. At the time, there were about 161,400 blacks in Jackson County and 451,000 whites, meaning roughly 77,500 blacks and 50,000 whites used food stamps.

In much wealthier Johnson County, 3% of residents received food stamps (6% of children, 2% of whites, 14% of blacks).

For other areas that make up the Kansas City metro, statistics were somewhere between these extremes. In Wyandotte County, it was 16% of residents (27% of children, 10% of whites, 31% of blacks). Platte County, 7% (14% of children, 5% of whites, 25% of blacks). Clay County, 11% (20% of children, 9% of whites, 33% of blacks).

Because they are disproportionately poor (due to America’s ugly racial history and modern racial discrimination), blacks are disproportionately on welfare. According to the 2015 State of Black Kansas City Equality Index, published by UMKC for the Urban League of Greater Kansas City, the poverty rate for blacks in the greater metropolitan area is more than double that of whites (29.8% versus 12.6%). Black median income is just over half that of whites ($29,724 versus $54,044). The median net worth for whites is nearly eighteen times higher: $6,314 for blacks, $110,500 for whites. The unemployment rate for blacks is double the unemployment rate for whites.

Overall, the majority of welfare users in the U.S. are non-black. Blacks make up 39% of all recipients (and only 4% of blacks use cash assistance, 6-12% use housing assistance, and 11-19% use food stamps; see Loveless and Tin, Dynamics of Economic Well-Being).

For more from the author, subscribe and follow or read his books.

Drug Use in Kansas City

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), from 2005-2010 about 13% of people over age 12 in the Kansas City metropolitan area (including counties in Kansas and Missouri) used illicit drugs each year.

That’s about 239,000 youths and adults in a city of 1.8 million. Drug use in Kansas City is about equal to Missouri as a whole and 1% lower than the nation as a whole. 9.6% of Kansas Citians used marijuana, 4.7% used pain pills.

The prevalence of certain drugs depends on where one lives. In recent years, cocaine was a large problem in black and brown communities in the inner city, while meth was a grave issue in the white suburbs — though neither drug is exclusive to a specific area. The National Drug Intelligence Center writes:

African American crack distributors frequently obtain powder cocaine for conversion from Mexican and Hispanic midlevel dealers located in the northeast section of Kansas City, Missouri, and from Mexican wholesale and midlevel dealers in Kansas City, Kansas. Mexican wholesale and midlevel dealers are typically supplied by sources in the El Paso and Phoenix areas.

Mexican wholesale and midlevel dealers typically distribute methamphetamine in outlying and suburban areas of the metropolitan area; most of the methamphetamine available and abused is Mexican ice methamphetamine. In addition, the Overland Park, Kansas, Police Department reports that CPD [controlled prescription drug] abuse has become so problematic that it is now considered the greatest drug threat in that jurisdiction. Oxycodone and hydrocodone are the most commonly abused controlled prescription narcotics, and officials from this police department reported in the third quarter of 2008 that they were investigating an increased number of CPD overdoses. CPD abuse is increasing, particularly among Caucasians between the ages of 16 and 24.

Since Colorado’s legalization of marijuana, that state has become a larger source for users in Kansas City. Kansas City is also a hub of activity in the heroin trade; the availability of heroin has been increasing since 2007. The first half of 2015 saw a 324% increase in heroin transported through the metro. A Kansas City Police Department sergeant said of heroin-related deaths, “We went from having one three to four years ago, that we knew of, to 14 last year [2014].” According to a report from the city website, the drug-related death rate for whites was 12 per 100,000 people, 11 per 100,000 for blacks, between 2009 and 2013.

In 2012, just over 10,000 Kansas Citians entered rehab for drugs and alcohol abuse. 65% of admissions were white, 28% black.

From 2006 to 2012, admittances for cocaine fell dramatically, heroin and marijuana remained steady, and meth increased. The inner city is more likely to see youth in rehab programs than outlying areas. The Mid-America Regional Council reports, “The number of adolescents admitted to residential care facilities in Jackson County make up almost half of the total number admitted, followed by Johnson County which makes up a quarter and Wyandotte County which makes up ten percent.”

For more from the author, subscribe and follow or read his books.

Colonial Courting Rituals Would Be Creepy As Sin Today

Finding a mate just isn’t what it used to be. Back in the “good ol’ days,” the parents were more parental, the sexism was more sexist, and the hysteria over sex was more hysterical. The courting rituals were truly bizarre, and we can thank our lucky stars they no longer exist. Of course, most of these rituals were only practiced by white straight people, and some only by wealthier colonial or Victorian-era Americans. But today we can all mock them relentlessly together. Let’s get to it.

 

WHEN YOUR DAD PICKS WHO YOU’RE GOING TO BED WITH FOREVER

Gone are the days when your old man could get together with his buddy at the tavern, kick back, down a few cold ones, and decide who you’re going to spoon for the rest of your f*cking life. Yes, if you were unwise enough to be born in colonial times, dorky dads would arrange your marriage for you, hearing not your sobs but rather the jingling of cold hard cash wrought from your dowery or inheritance (depends on your gender). End up with some ugo disgustor? If you didn’t have any Freudian reason to think of your dad during business time, you certainly had this reason.

 

WHEN THE GIRL SEDUCES YOU WITH A FAN

When you see a well-to-do Victorian gal cooling herself with her fan, she ain’t cooling herself with her fan, son. She’s engaged in a complex system of signals ranking somewhere between the high-step strut of the Blue-Footed Booby and the third base coach of the New York Yankees. Is she fanning herself slowly? Sorry, she’s engaged. Quickly? Single. Fanning with the right hand? Oh my God / look at that face / you look like / my next mistake. Left hand? F*ck off. Fan open, then shut? Kiss her, bro. Fan open wide? She loves you. Fan half open? You’ve just been friend-zoned. Legs shut — I mean fan — fan shut? She hates you. Good luck remembering all that. Don’t mess this up.

 

WHEN AGE REALLY WAS JUST A NUMBER

The age at which most colonial women married hovered around 19-22 (men were usually in their late twenties). So not too different from modern times. But remember, that’s an average. Some girls did marry when they were teenagers (others were married off as children). The age of consent in the American colonies was usually 10, though sometimes 12. Eventually, states started raising it. California raised it to 14 in 1889, then 16 in 1897. Others followed suit after that, though one technically kept the age at 7 until the 1960s (looking at you, Delawarean sickos).

 

WHEN YOU HAD TO DO ALL YOUR FLIRTING IN FRONT OF HER MOM

Remember your middle school and early high school dances and the agonizing embarrassment of the ever-present, complex surveillance apparatus made up of moms, dads, older siblings, teachers, and Principal Bacon? Well, back in the olden days, chaperones weren’t something you could just wait out as the years ticked by. When a man came a-calling, he had to sweep the girl off her feet in front of the potential mother-in-law. There was no one-on-one time. You went over to her house and, if f*cking Pride and Prejudice with Keira Knightly is any indication, make boring conversation while drinking tea, playing cards, or abusing a piano. Want to come back again? You’ve got to impress the ‘rents.

 

WHEN YOU COULD GET MARRIED LITERALLY BY JUST SAYING YOU WERE

Yes, one courting ritual was called “handfasting” or “spousing.” If you wanted to be married (by law, mind you), all you had to do was just hold hands and say you were married. You could do this anywhere and at any time, during this age that now sort of sounds like a Libertarian paradise. Apparently (to absolutely no one’s surprise), men would often be all for this, getting married on the spot to a nice yet sexually repressed girl, having sex, and disappearing into the night. Then daddy had to hunt you down — not to kill you for sleeping with his little angel as might happen today, but to force you to actually be her husband.

 

WHEN YOU PARTOOK IN SLEEPOVERS AT HER MOM AND DAD’S

It was a simpler time, when religious parents knew that kids would mess around and knew there was nothing they could do about it, so they decided to pretend to do something about it while willfully facilitating it. We’re talking bundling, people. When parents said Yes, you kids can have a sleepover as long as you promise not to have sex, let ma sew boyfriend up in bag, and let pa install an impervious one-foot-tall bundling board between your sides of the bed. Not letting Nathaniel sleep over was, apparently, deemed an ineffective way of preventing two lovebirds from engaging in smash game in the room adjacent to mom and dad’s.

 

WHEN THE “COURTSHIP STICK” WAS HOW YOU SEXTED

Just like today, when lovers send texts to each other while snuggling on the couch together after Christmas dinner so relatives can’t overhear them, colonials found a way to keep things spicy with secretiveness. The courtship stick was a six-foot-long hollow stick that allowed young men and women to whisper some sexy messages to each other in a world of zero privacy. Small homes with parents or parents-in-law, especially those that think touching is a no-no, mean there’s just no way to tell your gal her butt looks great in that dress she wears daily or your man that his plowing is an incredible turn on.

 

WHEN YOU COULD SKIP THE ENGAGEMENT RING AND GIVE HER A THIMBLE INSTEAD

If you lived among the Puritans, you didn’t have to get your woman an engagement ring. Instead, you could give her a helpful piece of sewing equipment. Puritans weren’t showy people, so a little thimble could be offered to the woman (in their defense, it would later be fashioned into a ring; cheap-ass Puritans), presumably as a sign of all the trousers she will have to repair over the course of her lifetime. That’s how you really blow away the ladies.

For more from the author, subscribe and follow or read his books.

5 Times Fox News Anchors Broke Rank

What is happening to Fox News? In an ocean of misinformation and fear-mongering, we have lately seen a few islands of reason and (dare I say it) liberal philosophy.

 

1) WHEN CHRIS WALLACE DISMANTLED JEB BUSH’S PLAN TO SLASH TAXES FOR THE WEALTHIEST AMERICANS

In September, after Jeb Bush, a typical Republican champion of corporations and the wealthy, proposed the tax plan he would push if elected president, Fox News anchor Chris Wallace called him out on it.

Wallace pointed that conservative tax analysts calculated it would add $1 trillion to $3 trillion to the deficit over ten years, and that the plan mainly benefits the rich: middle class earners would see a rise in income of 2.9%, while the wealthiest 1% would see an 11.6% increase (the lower class, the poor, seemed not worth mentioning).

It’s a massive disparity. A 2.9% increase for $40,000 of after-tax income is $1,160; an 11.6% increase of $1,000,000 of after-tax income is $116,000. Crumbs for ordinary people, fortunes for the wealthy.

Wallace said, “You would save, under your tax plan, $3 million. Does Jeb Bush need a $3 million tax cut?” Yes, a wealthy man wanting to cut taxes for the wealthy. Weird how that works.

Bush awkwardly stumbled through his platitudes: Giving more money to already extremely rich people and corporations would give ordinary workers new jobs and pay raises, spurring huge economic growth.

He insisted the growth would make the deficit problem, the massive loss of revenue due to tax cuts for the rich, disappear. Wallace reminded him that Bush’s father, George H. W. Bush, mocked this idea as “voodoo economics.”

Bush claimed his tax plan benefits would go “disproportionately to the middle class,” a lie so bold Wallace seemed taken aback. “Forgive me, sir, but…but 2.9 seems like less than 11.6.”

Quickly, Bush did a 180-degree spin move, saying that the richest 1% pay most of the taxes, so “of course tax cuts for everybody is going to generate more for people paying a lot more.”

If only Wallace had attacked again. “The rich pay the most in taxes” is not a valid reason for cutting taxes for rich people at higher rates. The wealthiest 1% own 43% of all wealth; the top 20% own 93%…the bottom 80% of Americans own 7% of the wealth; the bottom 50% own 2.5%. This is getting worse over time. During the last 35 years, nearly all income growth went to the very rich. Everyone else’s earnings stagnated or declined.

If the rich were losing their percentage of the wealth, then you could make a case for reducing their taxes. But if they are continuing to increase their share of all income, that’s a reason to increase their taxes.

Watch the interview here.

 

2) WHEN SHEP SMITH IMPLIED THE IDEOLOGY OF OBAMA AND THE POPE MIGHT BE UNIVERSAL, NOT “POLITICAL” (AKA “LIBERAL”)

When Pope Francis visited the U.S. several weeks ago, Bill Hemmer wondered on Fox News if the Pope’s speech to Congress was going to get “political.”

Shep came out of nowhere and responded with a shocking speech:

I think we are in a weird place in the world when the following things are considered political. Five things, I’m going to tick them off.

These are the five things that were on his and our president’s agenda. Caring for the marginalized and the poor — that’s now political. Advancing economic opportunity for all. Political? Serving as good stewards of the environment. Protecting religious minorities and promoting religious freedom globally. Welcoming [and] integrating immigrants and refugees globally. And that’s political?…

These seem like universal truths that we should be good to others who have less than we do, that we should give shelter to those who don’t have it. I think these were the teachings in the Bible of Jesus. They’re the words of the pope, they’re the feelings of the president.

Watch the video here.

 

3) THAT TIME CHRIS WALLACE DESTROYED CARLY FIORINA OVER THE FAKE PLANNED PARENTHOOD VIDEOS

During the Republican debate last month, Carly Fiorina angrily spouted, “I dare Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, to watch these tapes. Watch a fully-formed fetus, on the table, it’s heart beating, its legs kicking, while someone says we have to keep it alive to harvest its brain.”

She was referencing undercover videos that were deceptively edited by an anti-abortion group to make it appear as if Planned Parenthood was selling fetus body parts for profit. The tapes were fraudulent, and Planned Parenthood was cleared of wronging by the federal government and many states that launched investigations.

Yet the tapes did not include the scene Fiorina describes, only someone speaking about such an alleged event.

In an interview, Chris Wallace asked her, “Do you acknowledge what every fact checker has found, that as horrific as that scene is, it was only described on the video…there is no actual footage of the incident that you just mentioned?”

Stiffening, Fiorina snapped, “No, I don’t accept it at all. I’ve seen the footage and I find it amazing, actually, that all these supposed ‘fact checkers’ in the mainstream media claim this doesn’t exist, they’re trying to attack the authenticity of the videotape. I haven’t found a lot of people in the mainstream media who’ve ever watched these things.”

Nice. She won’t acknowledge there is no footage of a living fetus waiting to be cut open. It does exist. Really. She’s seen it. The corporate media, including Fox News apparently, just declined to watch it or include it in their round-the-clock coverage of the alleged scandal. If someone calls you out on your bullshit, just blame the media.

Fiorina went on to say, “I will continue to dare anyone who wants to continue to fund Planned Parenthood to watch the videos. And anyone who wants to challenge me will first have to prove to me that they watched it.”

Prove to you they watched a clip that doesn’t exist? A tall order. Also, what’s with all the “dares”? You’re going into politics, not the playground.

Wallace then outlined all the women’s health services Planned Parenthood provides besides abortion, but sadly didn’t connect the dots for Fiorina: that Planned Parenthood services are helping end abortions and that federal funds can’t be used for abortions, meaning Fiorina’s call to defund the organization is an exercise in ignorance.

Watch Wallace and Fiorina go at it here.

 

4) WHEN MEGYN KELLY LAUGHED AT A GUEST WHO SAID AHMED MOHAMED, THE BOY WHO INVENTED A CLOCK, WAS BEING “PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE.”

In September, 14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed was arrested for bringing a homemade clock to his Texas high school to show his engineering teacher. Another teacher thought it was a bomb, the principal and school staff questioned Ahmed, and called the police.

The police determined it was not an explosive, but arrested Ahmed for bringing a “hoax bomb,” a fake meant to spread fear–even though Ahmed insisted it was just a clock. He was taken to juvenile detention and not allowed to call his parents. Many Americans suspected he would have been treated differently had he been white.

In her Fox News report, Megyn Kelly said to former police detective Mark Furhman (former because of racist comments and a perjury conviction) that “you’ve got to feel bad for the kid. The kid did not do anything wrong.”

Furhman said, “I don’t feel sorry for Ahmed, because he offered no explanation to the police. He wouldn’t cooperate. He was passive aggressive by–”

Kelly cut him off, sounding incredulous: “Passive aggressive?” Unable to hold back laughter, she managed, “How? He’s a 14-year-old kid with cuffs on him!”

It’s funny because there was no evidence whatsoever that Ahmed was uncooperative or passive aggressive. Props to Kelly for mocking this lie. If only she hadn’t spent the rest of the report defending the actions of police and refusing to condemn ethnic stereotyping.

Watch here.

 

5) THE TIME SHEP SMITH DEMOLISHED KIM DAVIS AND HER SUPPORTERS

No guest was destroyed in the making of this epic commentary. Shep did this one alone.

Kim Davis, a county clerk in Kentucky, refused to grant marriage licenses to homosexual couples, was briefly imprisoned for breaking federal law, and then was comfortably accommodated by keeping her job but no longer having to put her name on marriage licenses.

Shep Smith attacked her and her followers for supporting an end to gay marriages using religion as justification. He said:

This is the same crowd that says “we don’t want Sharia law. Don’t let them come in here and start telling us what to do. Keep their religion out of our lives and out of our government.”

Then:

…the Supreme Court of the United States says that you can’t have things being okay for one group of people and not okay for another group of people. This is not unprecedented. They did it when they said that black and white people couldn’t marry… And now they’ve said straight people and gay people can also all get married.

But haters are going to hate. And we thought that what this woman wanted was an accommodation, which they’ve now granted her — something that worked for everybody, but it’s not what they want.

See it here.

For more from the author, subscribe and follow or read his books.

Fictional Rosa Parks Speech

First off, let me say there are many folk who could give a speech better than I. On top of that, there are many better men and women who walked the halls of this fine institution who should be standing here before you instead. Highlander Folk School shines on as a beacon for equality, a garden that continues to grow the best civil rights activists and labor organizers in the country. I am very happy to be back here and honored to speak on the bus boycott that occurred in Montgomery just a few years back. Seems people are under the impression these days that the boycott happened because of me. I would like to assure you this is untrue. I can’t take credit for the crusade that occurred in Alabama. I was just the last straw. There were others who would not give up their seat on a bus and were arrested long before me. On the day it happened to me, I just couldn’t bear the thought of giving up my seat on a city bus to another white man and standing in the back for the rest of the long ride home. I would rather be hauled off in handcuffs than face that humiliation and degradation again. As Mrs. Virginia Durr once wrote to you, Highlander gave me a taste of freedom and equality; I thought of this place while the officers dragged me off the bus and to the station.

Look ahead a single year, and our world is changed for the better. A boycott occurred, and it succeeded. After a single year, no black man or woman has to feel the burn of embarrassment or the injustice of segregation on a city bus again. The boycott didn’t succeed because we were organized, though that was part of it. It didn’t succeed because we were angry, though that was part of it as well. It succeeded because we had perseverance. Organization defines the road, anger gets you on the road, but making the long journey to the end of the road, that is perseverance.

Activists like Jo Ann Robinson, president of the Women’s Political Council, demonstrated what perseverance really is, and indeed so did her members. Mrs. Robinson wrote Mayor of Montgomery W. Gayle in 1954, with a polite request for more fair policies on city buses. She did not even ask for desegregation, but instead requested that blacks begin sitting at the back of the bus and whites begin sitting at the front, and when they meet in the middle and all the seats are occupied, that would be it. She asked that the buses make more stops in black neighborhoods and that we wouldn’t have to pay at the front of the bus and make the humiliating trudge to the back entrance.

Her message fell on deaf ears, for that same “honorable” judge she wrote to would two years later speak at the rally of the Central Alabama Citizens Council about how to preserve segregation. His presence supported and offered legitimacy to ten thousand angry white racists encouraging the killing of black men, women, and children. Jo Ann Robinson would not take no for an answer, however. Briefly mentioning the possibility of a boycott in her letter, she later organized it and made it a reality in December of 1955. She and her WPC members worked tirelessly into the early morning of the fifth to distribute tens of thousands of leaflets calling for a boycott all over Montgomery. Mrs. Robinson and fellow activists were arrested quickly after the movement began, but even in the face of harassment, imprisonment, and threats of violence, they did not yield.

If any two men showed us true strength of character and steady perseverance, it was the two reverends, Ralph Abernathy and Martin Luther King, Jr. They held Montgomery Improvement Association meetings every week until the boycott succeeded. Dr. King was unequivocally our leader. If I was the spark, he was the fire. He, under the same death threats and mistreatment we all faced and experienced, ignited a passion in our hearts that helped us see this thing through. At one MIA meeting, Dr. King said, “With every great movement toward freedom there will inevitably be trials. Somebody will have to have the courage to sacrifice. You don’t get to the Promised Land without going through the Wilderness. You don’t get there without crossing over hills and mountains, but if you keep on keeping on, you can’t help but reach it. We won’t all see it, but it’s coming and it’s because God is for it” (Martin Luther King, Jr. Speaks to the Crowd). We did what Dr. King called us to do. We kept on keeping on. We braved the wilderness. Dr. King, in his wisdom and his own depth of perseverance, inspired us to stay the course.

Then there was everyone else; every man, woman, and child who refused to ride the Montgomery buses. This boycott began as a one-day movement. Instead, it lasted a year, because the black folk of Montgomery united and persevered together. At the first mass meeting of the MIA, Dr. King and Reverend Abernathy had to fight their way into the church through a joyous crowd of seven thousand people. In February 1965, activist Bayard Rustin noted that “42,000 Negroes have not ridden the busses since December 5” and that two men “walked 7 miles and the other 14 miles” to work each day (Bayard Rustin’s Diary). They weren’t the only ones walking those distances, either. Moreover, during this period dozens of taxi drivers and car-pool drivers were arrested. Yet we did not yield. All the while white folks talked about using “guns, bows and arrows, sling shots and knives” to “abolish the Negro race” and act on white people’s right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of dead niggers” (Handbill from Central Alabama Citizens Rally). Yet we did not yield. We persevered together. As one black maid said during the second month of the movement, “When you do something to my people you do it to me too” (Interview About the Boycott). That is true unity of spirit.

 Our spirit went unbroken, and in November 1956 the Supreme Court upheld what we fought for in Browder v. Gayle. Bus segregation was rejected as unconstitutional and the next month buses in Montgomery were integrated. It was a glorious day when I again road a city bus. True equality is still a long way off. We are not out of the wilderness yet. However, the boycott victory has kept us going. As Dr. King said, “Let us continue with the same spirit, the same orderliness, with the same discipline, with the same Christian approach” (Martin Luther King, Jr. Speaks to the Crowd). There will be a day when prejudice and hate are not tolerated in this country. It is only a matter of time. Until that day, we will continue to persevere. We draw closer to the Promised Land.

For more from the author, subscribe and follow or read his books.